tank.gif
Review: Garmin Forerunner 305 Print E-mail
User Rating: / 137
PoorBest 
Written by Rob Mousley   
Wednesday, 25 January 2006

 (by Rob Mousley)

Garmin Forerunner 305 
 Forerunner 305

The Garmin Forerunner series of GPS units proved an instant hit with paddlers when they were released a year ago. Garmin has just released the next generation of units in the form of the 205/305 series.

I was fortunate enough to lay my hands on a Forerunner 305 for a weekend. In what I'm told is the first independent public review worldwide of the Forerunner 305, here’s what I found…

 

First Impressions

The unit really looks the part of a new generation – the case feels far more robust and the screen has a far higher resolution than that of the 301.

The heart rate monitor strap also has the appearance of much better quality; it’s softer and more comfortable too.

USB Port

The biggest complaint that paddlers have about the older 301 units, relates to the onboard USB port. The rubber cap that fits over it is just not up to the job of keeping salt water away from the delicate electrical contacts and the only way to ensure the longevity of the unit is to treat the port with silicone spray or grease and to tape the cap in place while the unit is in use.

Forerunner 305 on cradle 
 The USB cable now plugs into the cradle

This problem is much reduced on the 305 because Garmin has sensibly removed the USB port from the unit. To charge the unit and to connect it to your PC, you simply clip it onto a small cradle. A USB cable plugs into the cradle, which communicates with the unit via a set of 4 electrodes. Of course the electrodes are prone to corrosion when immersed in salt water – but this can be reduced by coating the electrodes with silicone grease.

 Enhanced Functionality

Almost every aspect of the unit has been improved. Major changes are:

  • The positioning and sensitivity of the antenna. The unit is designed for runners and the antenna is placed at an angle below the screen so that it faces upwards when worn on a runner’s wrist. Of course when you mount the unit on a surf ski, the antenna faces the floor. But this didn’t seem affect reception on the two occasions that I tried it.
  • Removal of the USB port.
  • The addition of “Course” functionality that allows you to record a particular downwind run for example and to compare subsequent runs against it (or against each other).

Plenty of minor enhancements:

  • Fans of the “auto pause” feature in the Forerunner 201 will be pleased to see its return. (Auto pause allows you to set up the unit to record only when traveling at a speed above a set threshold).
  • There’s an “auto lap” feature which triggers a new lap under any one of a set of different conditions (position/distance).
  • You can set up alerts for almost any condition you can think of triggered by time, distance, speed, or heart rate. These complement the already exhaustive Workout capabilities which allow you to set up simple, interval and advanced (i.e. freeform) training sessions.


Using the 305

305 on foot strap
 
 Foot strap mounting

The unit is designed to be strapped onto your wrist like a watch. You can’t do that when paddling though as the unit is so sensitive that it measures the speed of your wrist as it moves through the stroke. So I simply attached the unit to the footstrap of my ski in the same way that I do my 301.

During the weekend that I had the demo unit, I paddled twice. Neither paddle was in particularly extreme conditions so the unit’s waterproofing wasn’t rigorously tested.

But I did find that:

  • The position of the antenna didn’t seem to affect satellite reception.
  • The screen is easier to read than the 301’s.
  • During the second paddle (a race) the HR monitor stopped reading correctly during two five-minute intervals. But this seems to be a problem with all HR monitors (I’ve experienced the same thing both with the 301 and a Polar unit).

MotionBased.com

When I arrived home after my race, I was keen to download the data from the unit to Training Center, the analysis software that Garmin provides. Alas, my current version of Training Center wouldn’t talk to the 305 and the local agent hadn’t given me any software. (The production units are supplied with a new version of Training Center that includes support for Courses.) What to do?

Enter MotionBased. MotionBased specializes in writing software for GPSs and their support for the 301 (and now 305) is extraordinary. I found them at www.motionbased.com

I downloaded their “MB Agent” software, registered with the website and in very little time had my activities uploaded to my account. From there I could analyse my paddles, graph my heart rate, speed, and a dozen other metrics.

A particularly cute feature allows you export your track into Google Earth. If you haven’t come across Google Earth, it’s time you checked it out (www.googleearth.com). Here’s the track of our race last Sunday superimposed onto a satellite image of the area.

Langebaan Lagoon 
 Race Route exported to GoogleEarth

Quite apart from the more serious analysis functionality of MotionBased, it’s worth checking out just for the fun of it.  They even allow you to make your session data public.  Here are the three paddles that I did using the Forerunner 305:

First route, Social paddle in Hout Bay, South Africa:
http://trail.motionbased.com/trail/episode/view.mb?episodePk.pkValue=418533

Second route: warm up before a race at Langebaan Lagoon, South Africa
http://trail.motionbased.com/trail/episode/view.mb?episodePk.pkValue=418534

Third route: The race itself
http://trail.motionbased.com/trail/episode/view.mb?episodePk.pkValue=418535

What of the 201/301 series?

Garmin will continue (for a while at any rate) to sell the Forerunner 201 and 301 units at a reduced price. I noticed that you can pick up a Forerunner 301 on Amazon.com for around $170 now (approx. R1020).

Where can you buy a Forerunner 205/305 in South Africa?

  • Brian’s Kayaks (claim they’ll beat anyone else’s price – call them)
  • Sportsman’s Warehouse
  • Cape Union Mart

A note on “Grey Imports”

The local distributor for Garmin is Avnic Trading. I asked them why the South African prices are so much higher than those in the US.

Richard Gie, Avnic’s General Manager explained, “Our pricing is set by our principles and unfortunately the result is the discrepancy between our prices and those in the US.” He added, “We can’t support grey imports, but we try to make up for it with outstanding support for our local customers. For example, we are very liberal with our policy on water-damaged units. We replace them immediately, no questions asked. Try that overseas! Plus we replace them with stock units, so there’s no waiting. And the warranty is immediately extended by another full twelve months.”

“Remember too”, Richard said, “that Amazon prices don’t include the VAT that you’ll pay when the units arrive, plus you still have to pay delivery costs.”

So, for South African consumers the choice is: pay the higher price here in the knowledge that you’ll enjoy the insurance of great local support or pay a lower price for a grey import with the risk of having to ship the unit overseas if it goes wrong.

Where can you buy a Forerunner 205/305 in the US?

What I like

  • The robust case.
  • The high definition screen.
  • The added functionality.
  • MotionBased.com. (Most of which is free to use)

What I don’t like

  • The units generally cost about R1000 more in South Africa than in the US. “Grey” imports are not supported by the local distributor so you’re taking a chance if you bring them in yourself.
  • The antenna design, which is optimized for running, not paddling. (It doesn’t seem to be an issue though. My test unit worked just fine.)
  • The USB port on the cradle; my USB cable did not fit snugly, about 2mm of the metal tongue being visible outside the socket. It should plug snugly all the way in.
  • The cost of the advanced features MotionBased.com!

Summary

If I could afford the estimated retail price of R3200, I’d buy one of these units like a shot. As it is, I’ll be content with my 301 unit that, let’s face it, provides me with all the training and recording functionality that I need. When the 301 dies, I’ll upgrade.

(Of course, were Garmin to offer a trade-in option, I’d be first in the queue!)

 

Hits: 24044
Comments (19)Add Comment
Mack R.
written by Guest, January 25, 2006
Did I read the review right?
He said out of two workouts the writter had a bad HR reading of 5 minutes two times during one of the workouts.
During a 5 mile race that could be two miles out of five.
This is not a good sign that the Forerunner 305 had two five minute blank spots in the readings for heart rate.
I've had an Polar S625x for years and it has never had a blank spot for more than 5 or 10 seconds and only one or two runs a week out of 5 or 6 runs.

It sounds as if Garmin still hasn't gotten it right.
I just stick to my S625x.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Guest, January 25, 2006
I am glad they changed the port placement. Over the past 2 years I have had to replace 2 of the 301's due to corrosion and 1 due to the face leaking. I had a few irregular HR readings but that has been rare on the 301.Despite this problems I feel like it is a great training tool. Like the reviewer commented,I will be moving up to the 305 when my 301 dies. Wesley, Newport,RI
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Bad HR Readings
written by Guest, January 25, 2006
To be fair to Garmin, a sample of two workouts is not a statistically meaningful number. During the first workout I detected no spikes or blanks at all. Who knows what might have caused the blanks in the second session. The garminf newsgroup will no doubt make their findings known if the 305 does have problems. But even with the occasional blank spot, the unit is still the best training tool I have ever used.
Rob.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Guest, January 25, 2006
Could the "blanks" on the HR data simply be due to the large distance from the chest strap to the unit mounted on the footstrap? My Polar 625X will go "blank" at that distance, too.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Elevation Observation
written by Guest, January 27, 2006
Is this possible?

I've looked at all 3 routes you've uploaded to MotionBased and found it most amazing that it registered ZERO elevation gain (or drop)... Is this maybe due to the activity type (paddling)?

The reason I'm surprised is that in general GPS performs bad in recording accurate elevation changes - even on level surfaces it will record elevation changes ranging between -10 to +10 meters from my actual elevation (depending on the 3D accuracy of the GPS at the time).

If it indeed accurately recorded 0 feet elevation changes it would score a perfect 10 in my books for GPS accuracy...

Please let me know if it is indeed the case.

Regards
Andre Louw :grin
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
re: Elevation Observation...
written by Guest, January 27, 2006
>> ZERO elevation gain

I hadn't noticed that :-)

Of course it does make sense given the activity (paddling at zero feet above sea level)... Garmin is hyping "much more sensitivity" as one of the key features of this unit.

But as with my response to the guy who condemned the unit on the basis of a couple of bad HR readings from a single paddle, I'd want to use the unit a lot more before coming to any conclusions!
Rob M
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Elevation accuracy indeed too good to be
written by Guest, January 28, 2006
If you tell MotionBased that you were paddling, it automatically sets the elevation to zero no matter what the GPS actually measured! If you look at the actual data points you can see that the elevation reading varies quite a lot.
Rob
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
OTO
written by Guest, February 06, 2006
I have long been awaiting a GPS unit that allows you to compete against a "virtual self" from previous workouts along the same route. The 305 seems to offer just this with its Course feature.

I've downloaded the manual, but the feature isn't all that well described. What is your experience with this feature? I see that the unit displays a map with your current and recorded position, which is excellent. Can you also get a numerical, real-time display of the distance you're leading/lagging your previous/virtual self?

Kind regards,
OTO
Norway
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Guest, February 11, 2006
:upset :x :sigh
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Guest, February 14, 2006
:upset :x :-) :? :sigh :p :x
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Too many keypresses?
written by Guest, February 19, 2006
Hi,
I also read the manual, and to me it looks that you have to perform quite a few keypresses to do various tasks like marking a location, switch to virtual trainer mode, select a previously stored location as your next target, etc. While this is OK when hiking, I can't imagine myself pushing so many buttons while running. What was your overall impression on menu navigation/functions?
Thanks,
Peter
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
funforlife
written by Guest, February 19, 2006
I just pre-ordered one of these for $265 in the US. I'll let you how the virtual self works when it gets here. By the way there is a mini review of the 305 at motionbased's website by the creator of the site Aaron who also got a beta version...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Pete from San Diego
written by Guest, February 20, 2006
I am also anxious to see just how much more accurate the 305 is over the 301. I have been running with the 301 for my last twenty runs and have noticed continual problems with elevation readings (1000 foot elevation swing when I am running on the beach), and many spikes and drop-offs with my heart rate monitor (205 to 75 bpm on a run of a very even pace on flat ground (my max heart rate can't be more than 165)). If I have read the product info correctly, Garmin has stated that both these problems have been addressed, but I would like to hear more info from "field testers" as to whether the improvements actually resolve these problems.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Antoni from Seattle
written by Guest, February 20, 2006
I just wonder why Garmin didn't use Bluetooth instead of a USB port on the watch. I have the Nike Traix Elite (for running) and it connects to my computer via bluetooth. No cables.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Why USB?
written by Guest, February 28, 2006
The USB port recharges the battery in addition to transferring info to your computer. Bluetooth can't charge batteries... :cry
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Andrew - Perth West Australia
written by Guest, March 09, 2006
The 305 available in Aus is a different unit to the above. It is labeled as Edge 305 with HR (Aus$550) or Edge 305 with Cadence and HR ( Aus$559). These have the old USB ports at the back.

Cadence does not work with paddling as the points are too far apart so that stroke rate cannot be loaded with all the other data for paddlers.

You could use an accelerometer to measure this but this would be a separate unit and I don't think you could add it to the data in the Garmin software package.

Has anybody found a unit or method that can include stroke rate to the data?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
1 week
written by Guest, March 09, 2006
I've been using my FR305 for a week now. I've taken it paddling 5 times and it works great. It's really easy to program custom workouts. I program in warmup/cooldown time into every custom workout. For now I program everything into a workout so I only have to touch it once the entire workout to start it (no fun to constently take hand out of pogies).

Using SportTracks to analyze the data is much better than the Training center that comes with it. One touch export to Google Earth, detailed split analysis, etc. Free too.

Like Rob said, the screen is easy to read from the footstrap on my Mako (though water droplets will sometimes distort the screen..no big deal). I use 3 way split screen, though you can set the screen in any config you want up to 4 way split. And I think you can have it cycle through the screens/data you have set up.

I use a Finis TempoTrainer for a metronome to keep my stroke rate in check. The FR305 takes a couple seconds to show speed changes, but I find it fast enough to be useful in stroke experimentation. I wish they'd incorporate a metronome..It shouldn't be hard.

It's gotten wet (not submerged) every paddle and no problems with that.

Haven't tried HRM yet, sorry.

When you do set distances (say 1000m intervals), it beeps 5 times as you near the projected 1000m mark based on how fast you're paddling. Of course, it has the same warning beeps on timed sets ending with an alarm to tell you it's on to the next interval (or a cheesy victory tune when your workout is complete).

I've also run once with it (~10k) and thought it worked great, maybe 50% wooded trail.

Seeing that I used to use Google Earth to measure distances for workouts, and then if the winds picked up and I needed to paddle another way, oh well!..I think this unit is great. Sorry, I can't compare to previous versions..it's my first GPS. eric
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
sensitive.
written by flick, June 30, 2007
In the write up, it was said that paddlers cant wear it on their wrists as its so sensitive that it will measure the speed of their wrist movement. Would this not happen in running as well? Surely it would messure your arm movement if you wear it on your wrist and jog?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
motion based software
written by Jared Tubb, September 10, 2008
Is it possible to change the units of measure in the motion based software? For example, miles to km?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >