- Posts: 54
- Thank you received: 9
Steve Hansen wrote: I was hoping for just the opposite: A 560m with a 560L bucket length ! Wouldn't that make more sense ? Why would you want a bigger volume ski sized for a small paddler? Smaller person with big hips I guess. I think there's a stronger case for building a low volume ski for lightweight, long legged paddlers. As a matter of fact, I can't really think of a ski outside of the Epic V10L that fits that niche.
Uffilation wrote: S Hansen, would have thought so, too.
Marc, actual weights of 520s/560s scs7 are heavier than 12kg, or?
We should be receiving our first 560ML skis here in the USA in a couple of weeks. I will begin testing as soon as they arrive and will let you know. I use a 1cm seat pad in my 560L and the 560M seat is 8mm higher than the 560L seat, so I'm hoping it will feel similar but with a slightly more connected feeling due to the more narrow overall fit of the bucket/footwell. Excited to try it!
Llodrá wrote: Hi! Any pic related with the new 560 ml size? Just curious to know the way it feels on water