Yes. You got me there: I think a hybrid Elite S would be slightly more forgiving than the full carbon; but not by much.
I'm not paddling at the level that you are. I'm more towards the back end of the middle third. However I'm commenting because I've had experience with different layups of the same designs in two different models of ski. In one example I had a full carbon and a hybrid layup ski of exactly the same hull shape. The full carbon was just a little bit more lively. The difference was subtle and I only noticed it in rough and or downwind conditions. I really liked the way it bounced out of troughs and onto steeper waves. The hull design perfectly matched my (limited) ability so stability was not an issue. As a result I would always go with the lightest / stiffest layup of whatever design I thought suited my paddling.
Of course there are other perfectly valid considerations which may influence some people more than others. Speaking (only) for myself however, a few hundred bucks either way doesn't bother me. I'm very careful with my equipment and once I find a design that works for me; I stick with it for a long time so I get good value out of what might otherwise be considered an extravagant purchase. Other peoples experience, preferences and opinions will of course differ.
Current boats
Epic V10L Ultra, Epic V9 Ultra, Carbonology Sport Boost X LV, Fenn Bluefin, Nelo 510, Fenn XT double, Nelo 600, Expedition Kayaks Azure, Mirage 732.
Previous boats
Spirit PRS, Fenn Swordfish, Fenn XT, Fenn Swordfish S, Think Zen, Epic V10L Club, Carbonology Sport Boost LV